You wrote something that matters — a proposal, a plan, a memo — and sent it around for feedback. What came back was two thumbs-ups, one "looks great!", and a lot of quiet.
Some of them meant it. Some skimmed it. And someone has the exact objection that will surface in a month, at a worse time, because raising it now felt like being difficult.
Think With Me collects feedback differently. Each person you invite talks through your document in a private conversation with a facilitator that reads carefully and asks follow-up questions. No comment thread, no audience, no going first.
Your document, marked up the way an editor would return it: where people agree, where they disagree with you or with each other, what they raised that the document never addresses — and which sections nobody engaged with at all. Silence shows up too.
On top of the markup, a short brief: the handful of findings that should change what you do next. Every finding shows its evidence, with the strongest argument against it printed right underneath. You're never asked to take the summary's word for anything.
A draft that matters. Three to fifteen people whose honest reactions you need. Plans, proposals, memos, syllabi, sermon outlines, trip itineraries. Any group where being agreeable is easier than being honest.
Quick yes-or-no calls — use a poll. Feedback from one person — just talk. Decisions you've already made — people can tell, and the synthesis will say so.
Sign in with your email. No password, no install.