Everyone has a few people whose judgment they'd want on a draft. Think With Me gives each of them a private conversation about it, with a facilitator that has read the document closely and asks the questions a good editor would.
The conversations happen separately, so each person's reading stays their own. When everyone has finished, the document comes back to you annotated with what they thought, without saying who thought what.
It asks about fifteen minutes of each person.
Your document, marked up the way an editor would return it: where people agree, where they disagree with you or with each other, what they raised that the document never addresses, and which sections drew no reaction at all.
On top of the markup, a short brief: the handful of findings that should change what you do next, each with its evidence and the strongest argument against it printed right underneath.
A draft that matters. Three to fifteen people whose honest reactions you need. Plans, proposals, memos, syllabi, sermon outlines, trip itineraries. Any group with more to say than a comment thread can hold.
Quick yes-or-no calls — use a poll. Feedback from one person — just talk. Decisions you've already made — people can tell, and the synthesis will say so.